goirc/client/handlers_test.go

578 lines
18 KiB
Go

package client
import (
"code.google.com/p/gomock/gomock"
"fmt"
"github.com/fluffle/goirc/state"
"testing"
"time"
)
// This test performs a simple end-to-end verification of correct line parsing
// and event dispatch as well as testing the PING handler. All the other tests
// in this file will call their respective handlers synchronously, otherwise
// testing becomes more difficult.
func TestPING(t *testing.T) {
_, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
s.nc.Send("PING :1234567890")
s.nc.Expect("PONG :1234567890")
}
// Test the REGISTER handler matches section 3.1 of rfc2812
func TestREGISTER(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
c.h_REGISTER(&Line{Cmd: REGISTER})
s.nc.Expect("NICK test")
s.nc.Expect("USER test 12 * :Testing IRC")
s.nc.ExpectNothing()
c.cfg.Pass = "12345"
c.cfg.Me.Ident = "idiot"
c.cfg.Me.Name = "I've got the same combination on my luggage!"
c.h_REGISTER(&Line{Cmd: REGISTER})
s.nc.Expect("PASS 12345")
s.nc.Expect("NICK test")
s.nc.Expect("USER idiot 12 * :I've got the same combination on my luggage!")
s.nc.ExpectNothing()
}
// Test the handler for 001 / RPL_WELCOME
func Test001(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
l := parseLine(":irc.server.org 001 test :Welcome to IRC test!ident@somehost.com")
// Set up a handler to detect whether connected handler is called from 001
hcon := false
c.HandleFunc(CONNECTED, func(conn *Conn, line *Line) {
hcon = true
})
// Call handler with a valid 001 line
c.h_001(l)
<-time.After(time.Millisecond)
if !hcon {
t.Errorf("001 handler did not dispatch connected event.")
}
// Check host parsed correctly
if c.cfg.Me.Host != "somehost.com" {
t.Errorf("Host parsing failed, host is '%s'.", c.cfg.Me.Host)
}
}
// Test the handler for 433 / ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE
func Test433(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Call handler with a 433 line, not triggering c.cfg.Me.Renick()
c.h_433(parseLine(":irc.server.org 433 test new :Nickname is already in use."))
s.nc.Expect("NICK new_")
// In this case, we're expecting the server to send a NICK line
if c.cfg.Me.Nick != "test" {
t.Errorf("ReNick() called unexpectedly, Nick == '%s'.", c.cfg.Me.Nick)
}
// Send a line that will trigger a renick. This happens when our wanted
// nick is unavailable during initial negotiation, so we must choose a
// different one before the connection can proceed. No NICK line will be
// sent by the server to confirm nick change in this case.
s.st.EXPECT().ReNick("test", "test_")
c.h_433(parseLine(":irc.server.org 433 test test :Nickname is already in use."))
s.nc.Expect("NICK test_")
// Counter-intuitively, c.cfg.Me.Nick will not change in this case. This
// is an artifact of the test set-up, with a mocked out state tracker that
// doesn't actually change any state. Normally, this would be fine :-)
if c.cfg.Me.Nick != "test" {
t.Errorf("My nick changed from '%s'.", c.cfg.Me.Nick)
}
// Test the code path that *doesn't* involve state tracking.
c.st = nil
c.h_433(parseLine(":irc.server.org 433 test test :Nickname is already in use."))
s.nc.Expect("NICK test_")
if c.cfg.Me.Nick != "test_" {
t.Errorf("My nick not updated from '%s'.", c.cfg.Me.Nick)
}
c.st = s.st
}
// Test the handler for NICK messages when state tracking is disabled
func TestNICK(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// State tracking is enabled by default in setUp
c.st = nil
// Call handler with a NICK line changing "our" nick to test1.
c.h_NICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com NICK :test1"))
// Verify that our Nick has changed
if c.cfg.Me.Nick != "test1" {
t.Errorf("NICK did not result in changing our nick.")
}
// Send a NICK line for something that isn't us.
c.h_NICK(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com NICK :milk"))
// Verify that our Nick hasn't changed
if c.cfg.Me.Nick != "test1" {
t.Errorf("NICK did not result in changing our nick.")
}
// Re-enable state tracking and send a line that *should* change nick.
c.st = s.st
c.h_NICK(parseLine(":test1!test@somehost.com NICK :test2"))
// Verify that our Nick hasn't changed (should be handled by h_STNICK).
if c.cfg.Me.Nick != "test1" {
t.Errorf("NICK changed our nick when state tracking enabled.")
}
}
// Test the handler for CTCP messages
func TestCTCP(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Call handler with CTCP VERSION
c.h_CTCP(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG test :\001VERSION\001"))
// Expect a version reply
s.nc.Expect("NOTICE blah :\001VERSION powered by goirc...\001")
// Call handler with CTCP PING
c.h_CTCP(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG test :\001PING 1234567890\001"))
// Expect a ping reply
s.nc.Expect("NOTICE blah :\001PING 1234567890\001")
// Call handler with CTCP UNKNOWN
c.h_CTCP(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG test :\001UNKNOWN ctcp\001"))
}
func TestPRIVMSG(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
f := func(conn *Conn, line *Line) {
conn.Privmsg(line.Args[0], line.Args[1])
}
// Test legacy simpleCommands, with out the !.
SimpleCommandRegex = `^%v(\s|$)`
c.SimpleCommandFunc("prefix", f)
// CommandStripNick and CommandStripPrefix are both false to begin
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :prefix bar"))
s.nc.Expect("PRIVMSG #foo :prefix bar")
// If we're not stripping off the nick, the prefix won't match.
// This might be considered a bug, but then the library currently has a
// poor understanding of the concept of "being addressed".
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :test: prefix bar"))
s.nc.ExpectNothing()
c.cfg.CommandStripNick = true
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :prefix bar"))
s.nc.Expect("PRIVMSG #foo :prefix bar")
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :test: prefix bar"))
s.nc.Expect("PRIVMSG #foo :prefix bar")
c.cfg.SimpleCommandStripPrefix = true
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :prefix bar"))
s.nc.Expect("PRIVMSG #foo :bar")
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :test: prefix bar"))
s.nc.Expect("PRIVMSG #foo :bar")
c.cfg.CommandStripNick = false
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :prefix bar"))
s.nc.Expect("PRIVMSG #foo :bar")
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :test: prefix bar"))
s.nc.ExpectNothing()
// Check the various nick addressing notations that are supported.
c.cfg.CommandStripNick = true
for _, addr := range []string{":", ";", ",", ">", "-", ""} {
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(fmt.Sprintf(
":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :test%s prefix bar", addr)))
s.nc.Expect("PRIVMSG #foo :bar")
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(fmt.Sprintf(
":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :test%sprefix bar", addr)))
s.nc.ExpectNothing()
}
c.h_PRIVMSG(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG #foo :test! prefix bar"))
s.nc.ExpectNothing()
}
// Test the handler for JOIN messages
func TestJOIN(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// The state tracker should be creating a new channel in this first test
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
gomock.InOrder(
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("test").Return(c.cfg.Me),
s.st.EXPECT().NewChannel("#test1").Return(chan1),
s.st.EXPECT().Associate(chan1, c.cfg.Me),
)
// Use #test1 to test expected behaviour
// Call handler with JOIN by test to #test1
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com JOIN :#test1"))
// Verify that the MODE and WHO commands are sent correctly
s.nc.Expect("MODE #test1")
s.nc.Expect("WHO #test1")
// In this second test, we should be creating a new nick
nick1 := state.NewNick("user1")
gomock.InOrder(
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().NewNick("user1").Return(nick1),
s.st.EXPECT().Associate(chan1, nick1),
)
// OK, now #test1 exists, JOIN another user we don't know about
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com JOIN :#test1"))
// Verify that the WHO command is sent correctly
s.nc.Expect("WHO user1")
// In this third test, we'll be pretending we know about the nick already.
nick2 := state.NewNick("user2")
gomock.InOrder(
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user2").Return(nick2),
s.st.EXPECT().Associate(chan1, nick2),
)
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":user2!ident2@host2.com JOIN :#test1"))
// Test error paths
gomock.InOrder(
// unknown channel, unknown nick
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test2").Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("blah").Return(nil),
// unknown channel, known nick that isn't Me.
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test2").Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user2").Return(nick2),
)
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com JOIN :#test2"))
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":user2!ident2@host2.com JOIN :#test2"))
}
// Test the handler for PART messages
func TestPART(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// We need some valid and associated nicks / channels to PART with.
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
nick1 := state.NewNick("user1")
// PART should dissociate a nick from a channel.
gomock.InOrder(
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nick1),
s.st.EXPECT().Dissociate(chan1, nick1),
)
c.h_PART(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com PART #test1 :Bye!"))
}
// Test the handler for KICK messages
// (this is very similar to the PART message test)
func TestKICK(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// We need some valid and associated nicks / channels to KICK.
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
nick1 := state.NewNick("user1")
// KICK should dissociate a nick from a channel.
gomock.InOrder(
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nick1),
s.st.EXPECT().Dissociate(chan1, nick1),
)
c.h_KICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com KICK #test1 user1 :Bye!"))
}
// Test the handler for QUIT messages
func TestQUIT(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Have user1 QUIT. All possible errors handled by state tracker \o/
s.st.EXPECT().DelNick("user1")
c.h_QUIT(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com QUIT :Bye!"))
}
// Test the handler for MODE messages
func TestMODE(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
nick1 := state.NewNick("user1")
// Send a channel mode line. Inconveniently, Channel and Nick objects
// aren't mockable with gomock as they're not interface types (and I
// don't want them to be, writing accessors for struct fields sucks).
// This makes testing whether ParseModes is called correctly harder.
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1)
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com MODE #test1 +sk somekey"))
if !chan1.Modes.Secret || chan1.Modes.Key != "somekey" {
t.Errorf("Channel.ParseModes() not called correctly.")
}
// Send a nick mode line, returning Me
gomock.InOrder(
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("test").Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("test").Return(c.cfg.Me),
)
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com MODE test +i"))
if !c.cfg.Me.Modes.Invisible {
t.Errorf("Nick.ParseModes() not called correctly.")
}
// Check error paths
gomock.InOrder(
// send a valid user mode that's not us
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("user1").Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nick1),
// Send a random mode for an unknown channel
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test2").Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("#test2").Return(nil),
)
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com MODE user1 +w"))
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com MODE #test2 +is"))
}
// Test the handler for TOPIC messages
func TestTOPIC(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
// Assert that it has no topic originally
if chan1.Topic != "" {
t.Errorf("Test channel already has a topic.")
}
// Send a TOPIC line
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1)
c.h_TOPIC(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com TOPIC #test1 :something something"))
// Make sure the channel's topic has been changed
if chan1.Topic != "something something" {
t.Errorf("Topic of test channel not set correctly.")
}
// Check error paths -- send a topic for an unknown channel
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test2").Return(nil)
c.h_TOPIC(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com TOPIC #test2 :dark side"))
}
// Test the handler for 311 / RPL_WHOISUSER
func Test311(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Create user1, who we know little about
nick1 := state.NewNick("user1")
// Send a 311 reply
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nick1)
c.h_311(parseLine(":irc.server.org 311 test user1 ident1 host1.com * :name"))
// Verify we now know more about user1
if nick1.Ident != "ident1" ||
nick1.Host != "host1.com" ||
nick1.Name != "name" {
t.Errorf("WHOIS info of user1 not set correctly.")
}
// Check error paths -- send a 311 for an unknown nick
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user2").Return(nil)
c.h_311(parseLine(":irc.server.org 311 test user2 ident2 host2.com * :dongs"))
}
// Test the handler for 324 / RPL_CHANNELMODEIS
func Test324(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Create #test1, whose modes we don't know
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
// Send a 324 reply
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1)
c.h_324(parseLine(":irc.server.org 324 test #test1 +sk somekey"))
if !chan1.Modes.Secret || chan1.Modes.Key != "somekey" {
t.Errorf("Channel.ParseModes() not called correctly.")
}
// Check error paths -- send 324 for an unknown channel
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test2").Return(nil)
c.h_324(parseLine(":irc.server.org 324 test #test2 +pmt"))
}
// Test the handler for 332 / RPL_TOPIC
func Test332(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Create #test1, whose topic we don't know
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
// Assert that it has no topic originally
if chan1.Topic != "" {
t.Errorf("Test channel already has a topic.")
}
// Send a 332 reply
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1)
c.h_332(parseLine(":irc.server.org 332 test #test1 :something something"))
// Make sure the channel's topic has been changed
if chan1.Topic != "something something" {
t.Errorf("Topic of test channel not set correctly.")
}
// Check error paths -- send 332 for an unknown channel
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test2").Return(nil)
c.h_332(parseLine(":irc.server.org 332 test #test2 :dark side"))
}
// Test the handler for 352 / RPL_WHOREPLY
func Test352(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Create user1, who we know little about
nick1 := state.NewNick("user1")
// Send a 352 reply
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nick1)
c.h_352(parseLine(":irc.server.org 352 test #test1 ident1 host1.com irc.server.org user1 G :0 name"))
// Verify we now know more about user1
if nick1.Ident != "ident1" ||
nick1.Host != "host1.com" ||
nick1.Name != "name" ||
nick1.Modes.Invisible ||
nick1.Modes.Oper {
t.Errorf("WHO info of user1 not set correctly.")
}
// Check that modes are set correctly from WHOREPLY
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nick1)
c.h_352(parseLine(":irc.server.org 352 test #test1 ident1 host1.com irc.server.org user1 H* :0 name"))
if !nick1.Modes.Invisible || !nick1.Modes.Oper {
t.Errorf("WHO modes of user1 not set correctly.")
}
// Check error paths -- send a 352 for an unknown nick
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user2").Return(nil)
c.h_352(parseLine(":irc.server.org 352 test #test2 ident2 host2.com irc.server.org user2 G :0 fooo"))
}
// Test the handler for 353 / RPL_NAMREPLY
func Test353(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Create #test1, whose user list we're mostly unfamiliar with
chan1 := state.NewChannel("#test1")
// Create maps for testing -- this is what the mock ST calls will return
nicks := make(map[string]*state.Nick)
privs := make(map[string]*state.ChanPrivs)
nicks["test"] = c.cfg.Me
privs["test"] = new(state.ChanPrivs)
for _, n := range []string{"user1", "user2", "voice", "halfop",
"op", "admin", "owner"} {
nicks[n] = state.NewNick(n)
privs[n] = new(state.ChanPrivs)
}
// 353 handler is called twice, so GetChannel will be called twice
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test1").Return(chan1).Times(2)
gomock.InOrder(
// "test" is Me, i am known, and already on the channel
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("test").Return(c.cfg.Me),
s.st.EXPECT().IsOn("#test1", "test").Return(privs["test"], true),
// user1 is known, but not on the channel, so should be associated
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nicks["user1"]),
s.st.EXPECT().IsOn("#test1", "user1").Return(nil, false),
s.st.EXPECT().Associate(chan1, nicks["user1"]).Return(privs["user1"]),
)
for _, n := range []string{"user2", "voice", "halfop", "op", "admin", "owner"} {
gomock.InOrder(
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick(n).Return(nil),
s.st.EXPECT().NewNick(n).Return(nicks[n]),
s.st.EXPECT().IsOn("#test1", n).Return(nil, false),
s.st.EXPECT().Associate(chan1, nicks[n]).Return(privs[n]),
)
}
// Send a couple of names replies (complete with trailing space)
c.h_353(parseLine(":irc.server.org 353 test = #test1 :test @user1 user2 +voice "))
c.h_353(parseLine(":irc.server.org 353 test = #test1 :%halfop @op &admin ~owner "))
if p := privs["user2"]; p.Voice || p.HalfOp || p.Op || p.Admin || p.Owner {
t.Errorf("353 handler incorrectly set modes on nick.")
}
if !privs["user1"].Op || !privs["voice"].Voice || !privs["halfop"].HalfOp ||
!privs["op"].Op || !privs["admin"].Admin || !privs["owner"].Owner {
t.Errorf("353 handler failed to set correct modes for nicks.")
}
// Check error paths -- send 353 for an unknown channel
s.st.EXPECT().GetChannel("#test2").Return(nil)
c.h_353(parseLine(":irc.server.org 353 test = #test2 :test ~user3"))
}
// Test the handler for 671 (unreal specific)
func Test671(t *testing.T) {
c, s := setUp(t)
defer s.tearDown()
// Create user1, who should not be secure
nick1 := state.NewNick("user1")
if nick1.Modes.SSL {
t.Errorf("Test nick user1 is already using SSL?")
}
// Send a 671 reply
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user1").Return(nick1)
c.h_671(parseLine(":irc.server.org 671 test user1 :some ignored text"))
// Ensure user1 is now known to be on an SSL connection
if !nick1.Modes.SSL {
t.Errorf("Test nick user1 not using SSL?")
}
// Check error paths -- send a 671 for an unknown nick
s.st.EXPECT().GetNick("user2").Return(nil)
c.h_671(parseLine(":irc.server.org 671 test user2 :some ignored text"))
}