mirror of https://github.com/fluffle/goirc
649 lines
19 KiB
Go
649 lines
19 KiB
Go
package client
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"testing"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// This test performs a simple end-to-end verification of correct line parsing
|
|
// and event dispatch as well as testing the PING handler. All the other tests
|
|
// in this file will call their respective handlers synchronously, otherwise
|
|
// testing becomes more difficult.
|
|
func TestPING(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
m.Send("PING :1234567890")
|
|
m.Expect("PONG :1234567890")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 001 / RPL_WELCOME
|
|
func Test001(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Setup a mock event dispatcher to test correct triggering of "connected"
|
|
flag := false
|
|
c.Dispatcher = WasEventDispatched("connected", &flag)
|
|
|
|
// Call handler with a valid 001 line
|
|
c.h_001(parseLine(":irc.server.org 001 test :Welcome to IRC test!ident@somehost.com"))
|
|
// Should result in no response to server
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
// Check that the event was dispatched correctly
|
|
if !flag {
|
|
t.Errorf("Sending 001 didn't result in dispatch of connected event.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check host parsed correctly
|
|
if c.Me.Host != "somehost.com" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Host parsing failed, host is '%s'.", c.Me.Host)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 433 / ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE
|
|
func Test433(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Call handler with a 433 line, not triggering c.Me.Renick()
|
|
c.h_433(parseLine(":irc.server.org 433 test new :Nickname is already in use."))
|
|
m.Expect("NICK new_")
|
|
|
|
// In this case, we're expecting the server to send a NICK line
|
|
if c.Me.Nick != "test" {
|
|
t.Errorf("ReNick() called unexpectedly, Nick == '%s'.", c.Me.Nick)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a line that will trigger a renick. This happens when our wanted
|
|
// nick is unavailable during initial negotiation, so we must choose a
|
|
// different one before the connection can proceed. No NICK line will be
|
|
// sent by the server to confirm nick change in this case.
|
|
c.h_433(parseLine(":irc.server.org 433 test test :Nickname is already in use."))
|
|
m.Expect("NICK test_")
|
|
|
|
if c.Me.Nick != "test_" {
|
|
t.Errorf("ReNick() not called, Nick == '%s'.", c.Me.Nick)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for NICK messages
|
|
func TestNICK(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Call handler with a NICK line changing "our" nick to test1.
|
|
c.h_NICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com NICK :test1"))
|
|
// Should generate no errors and no response to server
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
// Verify that our Nick has changed
|
|
if c.Me.Nick != "test1" {
|
|
t.Errorf("NICK did not result in changing our nick.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Create a "known" nick other than ours
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "ident1", "name one", "host1.com")
|
|
|
|
// Call handler with a NICK line changing user1 to somebody
|
|
c.h_NICK(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com NICK :somebody"))
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
if c.GetNick("user1") != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("Still have a valid Nick for 'user1'.")
|
|
}
|
|
if n := c.GetNick("somebody"); n != user1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("GetNick(somebody) didn't result in correct Nick.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a NICK line for an unknown nick.
|
|
c.h_NICK(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com NICK :milk"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for CTCP messages
|
|
func TestCTCP(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Call handler with CTCP VERSION
|
|
c.h_CTCP(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG test :\001VERSION\001"))
|
|
|
|
// Expect a version reply
|
|
m.Expect("NOTICE blah :\001VERSION powered by goirc...\001")
|
|
|
|
// Call handler with CTCP PING
|
|
c.h_CTCP(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG test :\001PING 1234567890\001"))
|
|
|
|
// Expect a ping reply
|
|
m.Expect("NOTICE blah :\001PING 1234567890\001")
|
|
|
|
// Call handler with CTCP UNKNOWN
|
|
c.h_CTCP(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com PRIVMSG test :\001UNKNOWN ctcp\001"))
|
|
|
|
// Expect nothing in reply
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for JOIN messages
|
|
func TestJOIN(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// TODO(fluffle): Without mocking to ensure that the various methods
|
|
// h_JOIN uses are called, we must check they do the right thing by
|
|
// verifying their expected side-effects instead. Fixing this requires
|
|
// significant effort to move Conn to being a mockable interface type
|
|
// instead of a concrete struct. I'm not sure how feasible this is :-/
|
|
//
|
|
// Instead, in this test we (so far) just verify the correct code paths
|
|
// are followed and trust that the unit tests for the various methods
|
|
// ensure that they do the right thing.
|
|
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Use #test1 to test expected behaviour
|
|
// Call handler with JOIN by test to #test1
|
|
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com JOIN :#test1"))
|
|
|
|
// Ensure we aren't triggering an error here
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the MODE and WHO commands are sent correctly
|
|
m.Expect("MODE #test1")
|
|
m.Expect("WHO #test1")
|
|
|
|
// Simple verification that NewChannel was called for #test1
|
|
test1 := c.GetChannel("#test1")
|
|
if test1 == nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("No Channel for #test1 created on JOIN.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// OK, now #test1 exists, JOIN another user we don't know about
|
|
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com JOIN :#test1"))
|
|
|
|
// Again, expect no errors
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the WHO command is sent correctly
|
|
m.Expect("WHO user1")
|
|
|
|
// Simple verification that NewNick was called for user1
|
|
user1 := c.GetNick("user1")
|
|
if user1 == nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("No Nick for user1 created on JOIN.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now, JOIN a nick we *do* know about.
|
|
user2 := c.NewNick("user2", "ident2", "name two", "host2.com")
|
|
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":user2!ident2@host2.com JOIN :#test1"))
|
|
|
|
// We already know about this user and channel, so nothing should be sent
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
// Simple verification that the state tracking has actually been done
|
|
if _, ok := test1.Nicks[user2]; !ok || len(test1.Nicks) != 3 {
|
|
t.Errorf("State tracking horked, hopefully other unit tests fail.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test error paths -- unknown channel, unknown nick
|
|
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":blah!moo@cows.com JOIN :#test2"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
// unknown channel, known nick that isn't Me.
|
|
c.h_JOIN(parseLine(":user2!ident2@host2.com JOIN :#test2"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for PART messages
|
|
func TestPART(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create user1 and add them to #test1 and #test2
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "ident1", "name one", "host1.com")
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
test2 := c.NewChannel("#test2")
|
|
test1.AddNick(user1)
|
|
test2.AddNick(user1)
|
|
|
|
// Add Me to both channels (not strictly necessary)
|
|
test1.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
test2.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
|
|
// Then make them PART
|
|
c.h_PART(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com PART #test1 :Bye!"))
|
|
|
|
// Expect no errors or output
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
// Quick check of tracking code
|
|
if len(test1.Nicks) != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("PART failed to remove user1 from #test1.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test error states.
|
|
// Part a known user from a known channel they are not on.
|
|
c.h_PART(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com PART #test1 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Part an unknown user from a known channel.
|
|
c.h_PART(parseLine(":user2!ident2@host2.com PART #test1 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Part a known user from an unknown channel.
|
|
c.h_PART(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com PART #test3 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Part an unknown user from an unknown channel.
|
|
c.h_PART(parseLine(":user2!ident2@host2.com PART #test3 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for KICK messages
|
|
// (this is very similar to the PART message test)
|
|
func TestKICK(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create user1 and add them to #test1 and #test2
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "ident1", "name one", "host1.com")
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
test2 := c.NewChannel("#test2")
|
|
test1.AddNick(user1)
|
|
test2.AddNick(user1)
|
|
|
|
// Add Me to both channels (not strictly necessary)
|
|
test1.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
test2.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
|
|
// Then kick them!
|
|
c.h_KICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com KICK #test1 user1 :Bye!"))
|
|
|
|
// Expect no errors or output
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
// Quick check of tracking code
|
|
if len(test1.Nicks) != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("PART failed to remove user1 from #test1.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test error states.
|
|
// Kick a known user from a known channel they are not on.
|
|
c.h_KICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com KICK #test1 user1 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Kick an unknown user from a known channel.
|
|
c.h_KICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com KICK #test2 user2 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Kick a known user from an unknown channel.
|
|
c.h_KICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com KICK #test3 user1 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Kick an unknown user from an unknown channel.
|
|
c.h_KICK(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com KICK #test4 user2 :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for QUIT messages
|
|
func TestQUIT(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create user1 and add them to #test1 and #test2
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "ident1", "name one", "host1.com")
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
test2 := c.NewChannel("#test2")
|
|
test1.AddNick(user1)
|
|
test2.AddNick(user1)
|
|
|
|
// Add Me to both channels (not strictly necessary)
|
|
test1.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
test2.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
|
|
// Have user1 QUIT
|
|
c.h_QUIT(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com QUIT :Bye!"))
|
|
|
|
// Expect no errors or output
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
|
|
// Quick check of tracking code
|
|
if len(test1.Nicks) != 1 || len(test2.Nicks) != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("QUIT failed to remove user1 from channels.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Ensure user1 is no longer a known nick
|
|
if c.GetNick("user1") != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("QUIT failed to remove user1 from state tracking completely.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Have user1 QUIT again, expect ERRORS!
|
|
c.h_QUIT(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com QUIT :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Have a previously unmentioned user quit, expect an error
|
|
c.h_QUIT(parseLine(":user2!ident2@host2.com QUIT :Bye!"))
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for MODE messages
|
|
func TestMODE(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create user1 and add them to #test1
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "ident1", "name one", "host1.com")
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
test1.AddNick(user1)
|
|
test1.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
cm := test1.Modes
|
|
|
|
// Verify the ChanPrivs exists and modes we're testing aren't set
|
|
if cp, ok := user1.Channels[test1]; (!ok || c.Me.Channels[test1].Voice ||
|
|
cp.Op || cm.Key != "" || cm.InviteOnly || cm.Secret) {
|
|
t.Errorf("Channel privileges in unexpected state before MODE.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a channel mode line
|
|
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com MODE #test1 +kisvo somekey test user1"))
|
|
|
|
// Shouldn't get any errors or output
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Verify expected state afterwards.
|
|
if cp := user1.Channels[test1]; !(cp.Op || c.Me.Channels[test1].Voice ||
|
|
cm.Key != "somekey" || cm.InviteOnly || cm.Secret) {
|
|
t.Errorf("Channel privileges in unexpected state after MODE.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Verify our nick modes are what we expect before test
|
|
nm := c.Me.Modes
|
|
if nm.Invisible || nm.WallOps || nm.HiddenHost {
|
|
t.Errorf("Our nick privileges in unexpected state before MODE.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a nick mode line
|
|
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":test!test@somehost.com MODE test +ix"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Verify the two modes we expect to change did so
|
|
if !nm.Invisible || nm.WallOps || !nm.HiddenHost {
|
|
t.Errorf("Our nick privileges in unexpected state after MODE.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check error paths -- send a valid user mode that's not us
|
|
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com MODE user1 +w"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
|
|
// Send a random mode for an unknown channel
|
|
c.h_MODE(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com MODE #test2 +is"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for TOPIC messages
|
|
func TestTOPIC(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create #test1 so we have a channel to set the topic of
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
|
|
// Assert that it has no topic originally
|
|
if test1.Topic != "" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Test channel already has a topic.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a TOPIC line
|
|
c.h_TOPIC(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com TOPIC #test1 :something something"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Make sure the channel's topic has been changed
|
|
if test1.Topic != "something something" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Topic of test channel not set correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check error paths -- send a topic for an unknown channel
|
|
c.h_TOPIC(parseLine(":user1!ident1@host1.com TOPIC #test2 :dark side"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 311 / RPL_WHOISUSER
|
|
func Test311(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create user1, who we know little about
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "", "", "")
|
|
|
|
// Send a 311 reply
|
|
c.h_311(parseLine(":irc.server.org 311 test user1 ident1 host1.com * :name"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Verify we now know more about user1
|
|
if user1.Ident != "ident1" ||
|
|
user1.Host != "host1.com" ||
|
|
user1.Name != "name" {
|
|
t.Errorf("WHOIS info of user1 not set correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check error paths -- send a 311 for an unknown nick
|
|
c.h_311(parseLine(":irc.server.org 311 test user2 ident2 host2.com * :dongs"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 324 / RPL_CHANNELMODEIS
|
|
func Test324(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create #test1, whose modes we don't know
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
cm := test1.Modes
|
|
|
|
// Make sure modes are unset first
|
|
if cm.Secret || cm.NoExternalMsg || cm.Moderated || cm.Key != "" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Channel modes unexpectedly set before 324 reply.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a 324 reply
|
|
c.h_324(parseLine(":irc.server.org 324 test #test1 +snk somekey"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Make sure the modes we expected to be set were set and vice versa
|
|
if !cm.Secret || !cm.NoExternalMsg || cm.Moderated || cm.Key != "somekey" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Channel modes unexpectedly set before 324 reply.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check unknown channel causes an error
|
|
c.h_324(parseLine(":irc.server.org 324 test #test2 +pmt"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 332 / RPL_TOPIC
|
|
func Test332(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create #test1, whose topic we don't know
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
|
|
// Assert that it has no topic originally
|
|
if test1.Topic != "" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Test channel already has a topic.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a 332 reply
|
|
c.h_332(parseLine(":irc.server.org 332 test #test1 :something something"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Make sure the channel's topic has been changed
|
|
if test1.Topic != "something something" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Topic of test channel not set correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check unknown channel causes an error
|
|
c.h_324(parseLine(":irc.server.org 332 test #test2 :dark side"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 352 / RPL_WHOREPLY
|
|
func Test352(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create user1, who we know little about
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "", "", "")
|
|
|
|
// Send a 352 reply
|
|
c.h_352(parseLine(":irc.server.org 352 test #test1 ident1 host1.com irc.server.org user1 G :0 name"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Verify we now know more about user1
|
|
if user1.Ident != "ident1" ||
|
|
user1.Host != "host1.com" ||
|
|
user1.Name != "name" ||
|
|
user1.Modes.Invisible ||
|
|
user1.Modes.Oper {
|
|
t.Errorf("WHO info of user1 not set correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that modes are set correctly from WHOREPLY
|
|
c.h_352(parseLine(":irc.server.org 352 test #test1 ident1 host1.com irc.server.org user1 H* :0 name"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
if !user1.Modes.Invisible || !user1.Modes.Oper {
|
|
t.Errorf("WHO modes of user1 not set correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check error paths -- send a 352 for an unknown nick
|
|
c.h_352(parseLine(":irc.server.org 352 test #test2 ident2 host2.com irc.server.org user2 G :0 fooo"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 353 / RPL_NAMREPLY
|
|
func Test353(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create #test1, whose user list we're mostly unfamiliar with
|
|
test1 := c.NewChannel("#test1")
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "ident1", "name one", "host1.com")
|
|
test1.AddNick(user1)
|
|
test1.AddNick(c.Me)
|
|
|
|
// lazy lazy lazy ;-)
|
|
get := func(n string) *ChanPrivs {
|
|
if p, ok := test1.Nicks[c.GetNick(n)]; ok {
|
|
return p
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Verify the lack of nicks
|
|
if len(test1.Nicks) != 2 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Unexpected number of nicks in test channel before 353.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Verify that user1 isn't opped yet
|
|
if p := get("user1"); p == nil || p.Op {
|
|
t.Errorf("Unexpected permissions for user1 before 353.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a couple of names replies (complete with trailing space), expect no errors
|
|
c.h_353(parseLine(":irc.server.org 353 test = #test1 :test @user1 user2 +voice "))
|
|
c.h_353(parseLine(":irc.server.org 353 test = #test1 :%halfop @op &admin ~owner "))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
if len(test1.Nicks) != 8 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Unexpected number of nicks in test channel after 353.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(fluffle): Testing side-effects is starting to get on my tits.
|
|
// As a result, this makes some assumptions about the implementation of
|
|
// h_353 that may or may not be valid in the future. Hopefully, I will have
|
|
// time to rewrite the nick / channel handling soon.
|
|
if p := get("user1"); p == nil || !p.Op {
|
|
t.Errorf("353 handler failed to op known nick user1.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p := get("user2");
|
|
p == nil || p.Voice || p.HalfOp || p.Op || p.Admin || p.Owner {
|
|
t.Errorf("353 handler set modes on new nick user2.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p := get("voice"); p == nil || !p.Voice {
|
|
t.Errorf("353 handler failed to parse voice correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p := get("halfop"); p == nil || !p.HalfOp {
|
|
t.Errorf("353 handler failed to parse halfop correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p := get("op"); p == nil || !p.Op {
|
|
t.Errorf("353 handler failed to parse op correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p := get("admin"); p == nil || !p.Admin {
|
|
t.Errorf("353 handler failed to parse admin correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p := get("owner"); p == nil || !p.Owner {
|
|
t.Errorf("353 handler failed to parse owner correctly.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check unknown channel causes an error
|
|
c.h_324(parseLine(":irc.server.org 353 test = #test2 :test ~user3"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the handler for 671 (unreal specific)
|
|
func Test671(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, c := setUp(t)
|
|
defer tearDown(m, c)
|
|
|
|
// Create user1, who should not be secure
|
|
user1 := c.NewNick("user1", "ident1", "name one", "host1.com")
|
|
if user1.Modes.SSL {
|
|
t.Errorf("Test nick user1 is already using SSL?")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send a 671 reply
|
|
c.h_671(parseLine(":irc.server.org 671 test user1 :some ignored text"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectNoErrors()
|
|
|
|
// Ensure user1 is now known to be on an SSL connection
|
|
if !user1.Modes.SSL {
|
|
t.Errorf("Test nick user1 not using SSL?")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check error paths -- send a 671 for an unknown nick
|
|
c.h_671(parseLine(":irc.server.org 671 test user2 :some ignored text"))
|
|
m.ExpectNothing()
|
|
c.ExpectError()
|
|
}
|